Okay, So When are they going to fire?

Shareholders Rake Anti-Gun Dick’s CEO Over Coals During Public Shareholders Meeting

Now, Dick’s Sporting Goods is hearing from its stockholders.

Since the company reacted to the February massacre at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School by betraying its customers who support the Second Amendment, Dick’s has been hit by the gun industry, from street-level stores to corporate decision-makers.

But at a shareholders meeting on Wednesday, Dick’s heard from people with skin in the game.

In a direct attack on Dick’s CEO Edward Stack and other members of the company’s board, shareholder David Almasi, vice president of the National Center for Public Policy Research, raked the company’s leadership over the coals.

To the company’s top officers, Almasi charged, “virtue signaling” was more important than the company’s sales.

TRENDING: Smug NY Reporter Forced to Edit Out Racist Statement Printed About Kimberly Guilfoyle

After the school shooting in Parkland, Florida, Dick’s announced it would no longer sell AR-15s (the “assault weapon” liberals hate the most these days) and would restrict firearms sales to those 21 years of age or older.

Those might be considered defensible business decisions, perhaps with worries about liabilities in mind, but Dick’s directors went even further, hiring an anti-gun Washington lobbying firm to actively work against Second Amendment freedoms in the nation’s capital.

Almasi cited that decision in particular in his attack.

Listen to the whole thing here:

After the Parkland shooting, Almasi said, “Dick’s Sporting Goods immediately engaged in corporate virtue signaling, by ending the sale of AR-15s, high-capacity magazines and other accessories. Dick’s also no longer sells guns to people until three years after they’re eligible for military service.

“In addition, Dick’s reportedly hired lobbyists to promote gun restrictions, even though you’re literally in the business of selling guns …

“The company is willfully giving up money. It’s damaged its reputation by lending its voice and its resources to those who want to abolish the Second Amendment, even while the vast majority of … citizens support the amendment,” Almasi said.

“Thirty percent of Americans own guns and another 11 percent live with someone who does. Now you’ve alienated them.”

Will Dick’s regret its anti-gun positions?

YesNo

.
98% (2240 Votes)
2% (41 Votes)

RELATED: Florida Revokes Hundreds of Carry Permits After ‘Deceitful’ Worker Sabotages Background Check System

According to Fox Business Network, Dick’s has made up for its losses in firearms-related sales in other areas and the stock has risen by 13 percent over the past month.

Liberals like the crew at ThinkProgress are crowing that that proves the Dick’s critics are wrong, but it could well be a short-term effect from the political moment. Dick’s got a lot of headlines out of its anti-gun stance, and liberals could well have decided to patronize the stories because of the publicity.

In the long-term, though, Dick’s has a vested interest in pleasing its outdoors customer base, and its anti-gun decision was a flagrant snub to millions of Americans who could well have been spending their money at Dick’s instead of at a competitor. And shareholders don’t like having company executives who are “willfully giving up money.”

It’s likely not the last time Dick’s shareholders rake the company execs over the coals.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.

Something to Think About…

Considering the chaotic and splintered condition of our Nation and the broken nature of our Christian church, just about anything could happen.  The Nation and Christians has to do several things.  We need to walk Circumspectly paying close attention to everything around us, pray for discernment, strength and a national Christian revival.  We must join together with our real conservative leadership and get rid of the Shadow Government and Drain the Swamp.  We know, according to Bible prophecy, that we will suffer the period of a one world order and Christians will be under great persecution, however, only God knows the appointed time.  It is my studied opinion, that the time has not yet come, and for the Christian and the Nation to continue to move through life as a free Nation, we must crush liberalism’s plan for globalization.  Pray with me for revival, with the heart of 2nd Chron 7:14.

God Bless you.

R.S. Helms.

 

The following story is reblogged on Bob’s Opinion from AMAC, the Daily Torch, and authored by Robert Romano … Thank you all.

 

 

 

AT&T-Time Warner Merger – Mass Media Consolidation Could Lead the Way to One-Party Rule in The U.S.

Posted Thursday, June 14, 2018   |   By Collaborative Correspondent  

Time Warner ATT
Control the Media – Control the People

A vibrant and healthy democracy depends on the free marketplace of ideas.

Call it what you want. Viewpoint diversity. Access to alternative views.

In today’s media and information-driven society and culture, being able to find the opposing view on an issue, to compare the pros and cons of public policy matters or different products and services, is critical to how the American people make decisions about just about everything.

What to buy? Who to vote for? What to watch? Which music to listen to? What to wear? The plethora of choices we have today is owed entirely to the openness of the Internet and other media that facilitates and enables brand development.

But what if that process could become compromised or disrupted in a bid to control media? To control what messages were available to the public? This is the very real danger facing policymakers today in an environment increasingly moving towards mass media consolidation.

With federal judge Richard Leon’s approval of the $107 billion AT&T-Time Warner merger, allowing the two companies to combine, the floodgates are opening for content distributors like AT&T — which owns Directv — to also own much of content that plays on those platforms.

Now, Comcast is expected to bid against Disney to buy much of Fox’s media content properties.

So, what’s the problem? Besides the antitrust laws that are invoked by monopolization in any industry, mass media consolidation has meant fewer and fewer companies controlling almost all major media in the country.

A comprehensive Free Press 2018 study on major media ownership finds that just 21 corporations own all the television broadcast stations, 21 that own the radio broadcast stations, 13 that own pay television channels, 11 that own daily newspapers and 18 that own telecom and cable. That number keeps getting smaller every time there’s another merger.

A chapter on the topic in Censored 2006 by Bridget Thornton, Britt Walters and Lori Rouse, “Corporate Media is Corporate America” noted the massive overlap of individuals who sit on the boards at major media outlets and those of non-media corporations.

Then there is the dominance in tech by Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Facebook and Twitter.

Rapidly, the number of separately owned options is dwindling.

Along with media consolidation, there is also a growing call for political consolidation in Washington, D.C. — and even one-party rule.

In April, Twitter co-founder and CEO Jack Dorsey retweeted an article by Peter Leyden and Ruy Teixeira that called for “Democratic One-Party Rule” in the U.S. as a means of reconciling the nation’s challenges and implementing the progressive agenda. You see, all that debate by Congress and disagreement over which direction to go in is getting in the way of that agenda, so democracy no longer functions the way they want it to. Today’s captains of the information industry are getting impatient. They want to see Utopia in their lifetimes.

It will be anything but.

But leaving that aside, forget about competitive elections, Leyden and Teixeira warn: “America can’t afford more political paralysis. One side or the other must win. This is a civil war that can be won without firing a shot. But it is a fundamental conflict between two worldviews that must be resolved in short order.”

The resolution: “Democratic One-Party Rule.”

Dorsey’s comment was astonishing, writing briefly, “Great read.” Really? What about the part where the authors called for one-party rule? What about the part where they called it a civil war? No?

Just, “Great read,” as if having one political party control the most powerful country in the world to govern with no dissent as the climatic outcome of a civil war “without firing a shot” was just an after-thought for the billionaire.

Who needs alternate viewpoints when there’s media empires to consolidate and an undemocratic agenda to implement? Just hurry up and work it into the afternoon schedule. Dictatorship by close of business. Can we get that yesterday?

Twitter like other social media giants cast themselves as an open platform, a device for free speech basically and the marketplace of ideas. But what if big media doesn’t live up to that and starts censoring political content of one of the two major parties in a bid for absolute power?

Would that be “anti-competitive” enough for Judge Leon to say it might pose an antitrust issue under federal law?

That is why the AT&T-Time Warner merger today is so important for the media landscape of tomorrow, and why the Justice Department must appeal Judge Leon’s decision, all the way to the Supreme Court if necessary.

It may not happen overnight, but we are witnessing the end of media. This is the age of medium. And if we are not careful, one day there may only be one-party rule, too. That will not lead to liberty and prosperity, but to tyranny.

From – Daily Torch – by Robert Romano

A Deep Concern …

Reblogged on Bob’s Opinion … from AMAC Newsletter.

 

Nearly Four In Five College Departments Don’t Employ A Single Republican

 

columbia-university-college-768x500

 

To set foot on an American college campus, as anyone who’s spent a picosecond thereabout lately can tell you, is to step through a left-wing looking glass. But a jaw-dropping new study from the National Association of Scholars (NAS) reveals just how deep the rabbit hole goes: among tenure-track college professors at the nation’s top-ranked liberal arts schools, registered Democrats outnumber registered Republicans by more than 10 to 1.
Rather than culling data from some voluntary survey, the report uncovers the political leanings of 8,688 elite academics by cross-referencing publicly available voter registration information with faculty lists from 51 colleges. At these schools, “78.2 percent of departments do not employ a single Republican.” And that’s just the topline.
The numbers below the fold, broken down by college and field of study, are even more alarming. Over at Wellesley College, perhaps best known for fostering pantsuited diplomats and disdain for the late Barbara Bush, there are 136 Democrat professors for every Republican. More than a third of the colleges assessed have ratios of at least 20-to-1.
At the low end of the spectrum are schools like the Naval Academy, where still more than twice as many Ds as Rs appear at the front of the lecture hall. Lopsided leanings are also evident in key disciplines, such as environmental studies (25-to-1), the humanities (32-to-1), and sociology (44-to-1).
Even If You’re Liberal, This Is Bad News
Look, it’s news to no one (except maybe the frequently confused Matt Yglesias) that the Left smothers conservative thought in academe. But at this magnitude, the consequences go far beyond who gets to wear tweed jackets with elbow patches. Each year, America’s universities ingest millions of bright but ideologically inchoate young people fumbling towards adulthood. Failing to expose them to an extensive menu of different ideas is a sure recipe for parochialism and intellectual indolence.
Even those who would welcome a unanimously liberal generation of Americans must recognize that a mind untested is as useful as a pencil unsharpened: it may be the tool you need, but good luck filling out your Scantron. The most valuable test of one’s worldview is to be confronted by an earnest exponent of a different or even contradictory one.
Moreover, consider the impact of straitjacketed thinking on academic inquiry. Despite being lavished with billions by American taxpayers, the social sciences are engulfed in a vexing replication crisis. Hundreds of findings once considered axiomatic have been impossible to reproduce, casting doubt on entire corpuses of published work in some disciplines.
Is this really all that gobsmacking, however, given the tool we use to appraise its validity? Peer review aims to ensure that academic evidence can be trusted by subjecting it to the rigorous scrutiny of reviewers with expertise comparable to the author. Yet as activists and politicians grasp ever more desperately at studies to lend scientific heft to their policy wish lists, academic research has become increasingly politicized. A panel drawn from a cohort of homogeneous thinkers cannot be expected to fairly assess evidence that has a political impact.
Look no further than the Implicit Association Test (IAT), a tool social psychologists developed that purports to measure unconscious prejudice. After being cited in more than 3,000 peer-reviewed papers by “psychologists [desiring] to help solve social problems,” and eagerly circulated by fellow travelers in the media, it was revealed that the test returns wildly unreliable results and has no impact on discriminatory behavior.
Despite failing to meet basic scientific standards, the IAT has been taken by more than 17 million people worldwide, featured in multimillion-dollar federal grants, and made the centerpiece of countless corporate diversity workshops. These academic blunders carry a price we will continue to pay until we recognize the limitations of peer review in an echo chamber.
This Means the ‘Consensus’ Is Tilted
The same applies to the notion of “scientific consensus,” commonly aired today in discussions about climate change. In 2014, noted demagogue John Oliver excoriated the media for daring to present viewers both sides of a political question by holding a “statistically representative” mock debate. To illustrate the percentage of scientists who agree on climate change, he trotted out 97 extras in white coats to shout down three climate skeptics.
To this profusion of unintentional irony, the NAS study adds another nugget: the 25-to-1 partisan ratio among environmental studies faculty means that out of professors who declare for a party, 96.2 percent are Democrats. By no means does this invalidate the conclusions of climate scientists. But policymakers should be aware that the oft-cited “consensus” is not necessarily a meeting of purely objective minds.
Let’s face it: the academy’s ability to perform credible peer review and proclaim scientific consensus will be hindered until it reclaims ideological pluralism. But how? The study argues that, “[t]he solution to viewpoint homogeneity may lie in establishing new colleges from the ground up” because reforming hidebound institutions “seems a very tall order.” Yet a vast new expansion, in the context of bloated federal outlays and overextended state budgets, seems even more improbable.
There is no choice but to reform existing universities, although it will take a Herculean effort from within to expand the institutional Overton window. These days, you can hardly walk through a quad without turning up some provost or vice chancellor underfoot, vowing to promote diversity. It’s past time for these administrators to show some mettle and apply that principle not just to race, sex, and creed, but to ideas also.
That means ceasing the assault on academic freedom and putting the kibosh on the heckler’s veto. Those interested in a truly plural discourse on campus should also think twice before reaching for the typical administrative pro-diversity playbook. Mandatory training seminars and hiring quotas are poor solutions, whomever they favor. Instead, we should take matters into our own hands.
Here’s How to Start
First, students and professors with divergent views must be bold enough to publicly voice them. The chilling effect of overwhelming viewpoint discrimination drives right-leaning prospective young academics into tight-lipped diffidence, if not different callings altogether. The magnetism of compelling mentors—visible evidence that conservatives indeed belong—is an indispensable counterweight that must be strengthened.
Meanwhile, freethinkers should join (or promote and support) nonpartisan organizations that defend viewpoint diversity and freedom of speech on campus, like the Heterodox Academy and the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. The surveys, tools, and research that groups like these produce are materiel for the vanguard.
Finally, right-leaning professors should strive to play a larger role in peer review, though not a tendentious one. These panels should not become venues for ideological combat, but a variety of perspectives is a needed check on cognitive biases, to which even pedigreed scholars are susceptible.
It goes without saying that all this may come at a substantial individual cost, denominated in professional opportunities and even personal relationships. But it must be paid. Otherwise, partisan faculties will continue to gather momentum like heavy stones tumbling down a hillside. The few conservatives in academia must be willing to stand athwart these boulders yelling Stop, no matter the risk of being flattened. The integrity of the academy depends on it.
From – The Federalist – by William Estes

More Obama Fraud?

Reblogged from Nox & Friends … A charming piece of information to make us wonder even more about the depth of the Swamp.

 

SNAP = Fraud
By SafeSpace | March 30, 2018 | Alinsky, Barack Hussein Obama (asshole), Culture War, Democrats, Dumbassery, Entitlements/Free Stuff, Evil Left, Lefties
It never fails: Some leftist politician authorizes the distribution of millions of taxpayer dollars in the form of free stuff to “the needy”, then redefines “needy” as anyone who meets bullshit criteria that frequently DISregard income, employability and citizenship status. Magically, the number of “needy” grows exponentially, and millions more hands reach into the pockets of honest American workers. And the “free stuff” program descends into corruption and abuse.

This sequence of events played out at local, state and national levels bigtime during the eight years of the Batears Regime. King Putt encouraged officials in Appalachia USDA offices that dealt with the poor (both folks in actual poverty and those simply suffering from poverty of spirit) to destroy the ethic of self-reliance and corrode the respect for a day’s work for a day’s pay. His directives caused bonuses to be paid to USDA employees who recruited the most new SNAP enrollees. BHO replaced the time-honored work/paycheck equation with free stuff, available without the “stigma” of welfare through SNAP, the renamed food stamp program. Note that Soetero’s socialist approach was not limited to the Blue Ridge; it played out in different forms nationwide. States and localities that had large numbers of illegals also found ways to add ’em all to the SNAP rolls.

SNAP benefits can be grossly abused because the program actually exists for three purposes: Feeding the hungry, of course … but also building the culture of dependency on central government, and enlarging the Democrat voter rolls. By granting SNAP eligibility withOUT citizenship requirements, both the number of dependents and the level of fraud increases.
Judicial Watch presented the following report a few days ago … one more feather in JW’s war bonnet in their battle against leftard corruption.
Nearly 200 Busted in $3.7-Million Food-Stamp Fraud Operation
More than a year after the Obama administration slammed American taxpayers with a record-high tab to provide an unprecedented number of people with food stamps, the fraud continues full-throttle in the bloated welfare program. Authorities in north Florida arrested nearly 200 people for operating a sophisticated ring in which millions of dollars in food stamps were fraudulently exchanged for cash and drugs. Keep in mind that food stamps—renamed by the Obama administration Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) to eliminate stigma—are designed to help nourish the nation’s most needy.
For years Judicial Watch has reported extensively on the rampant fraud in the program that cost U.S. taxpayers a bewildering $80.4 billion in one year to provide a record 46 million people with the welfare benefit during the Obama tenure. Even then, a federal audit revealed that many who didn’t qualify for food stamps received them under a special “broad-based” eligibility program that disregards income and asset requirements. The expansion was part of the former president’s mission to eradicate “food insecure households” in the U.S. To accomplish it, the administration spent millions of dollars on ad campaigns to recruit more food-stamp recipients, even doling out hefty cash rewards to local governments that signed up the most people. One state even bragged about a $5 million performance bonus it got from the feds for its “swift processing of applications.”
Not surprisingly, the food stamp program became a hotbed of fraud and corruption. Recipients use social media to illegally sell and buy food stamps online and others use the welfare benefit to buy drugs, weapons and other contraband from unscrupulous vendors, according to a federal audit that also says some trade food stamps for reduced amounts of cash. The fraud costs the government hundreds of millions of dollars, the audit discloses. This was back in 2012 when the inspector general of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), the agency that distributes food stamps, told Congress about the serious issues plaguing the program. Things got so out of control that the Obama administration dedicated $7 million to crack down on food-stamp fraud in 2014. Among the anti-fraud initiatives that the money funded were strategies to identify and successfully investigate attempts to buy or sell SNAP benefits online using social media such as Facebook, Twitter or ecommerce websites like Craigslist and eBay.
More than a year after Obama left the USDA program in disarray, the scams continue. In the recently busted Florida operation, more than 22,000 fraudulent transactions totaling $3.7 million were documented by a task force of local and federal authorities. It has been coined Operation Half-Back and a Jacksonville news report says undercover officers personally observed 115 individuals commit 390 fraudulent transactions involving food stamps. In most cases the food-stamp recipient took 50 cents per $1 in benefit. Some of the corrupt vendors were stores but many were mobile businesses that sell food and have USDA approval to accept food stamps as payment. Among the biggest offenders are a produce business that recorded 7,164 fraudulent transactions for $1.1 million, another that had 7,390 transactions totaling $1 million, a seafood store that recorded 3,958 transactions for $1.2 million and a mobile meat vender that had 3,958 fraudulent transactions for $572,282.
The undercover sting started back in 2012, the year the Obama administration shattered food-stamp records. Law enforcement agencies created fictitious businesses, according to the Florida Attorney General’s office, which disclosed last week that more than 115 individuals have been charged with felonies and 61 others with misdemeanors. Though the federal government doles out food stamps, in Florida a state agency called Department of Children and Families administers it to provide nutrition assistance to vulnerable populations such as children, senior citizens and families in economic distress. “Food stamp trafficking steals from Florida’s hardworking taxpayers,” Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement. “The SNAP/EBT program is designed to provide services to the most vulnerable among us and for anyone to take advantage of this system is shameful.”
Florida seems to be a hotbed of food-stamp rackets. Less than two years ago the feds busted the largest food-stamp fraud operation in U.S. history in south Florida. Twenty-two defendants in the largely black and Hispanic areas of Miami-Dade County known as Opa-Locka and Hialeah swindled the government out of $13 million by fraudulently trading food stamps for cash. The crooked vendors operated food and produce stands at a local flea market as part of then-First Lady Michelle Obama’s initiative to eradicate “food deserts,” common in poor, minority communities where fresh, healthy food is tough to find or often unavailable. The feds say the business owners and their employees let food-stamp recipients use their welfare benefit to get cash in exchange for a cut of the money.
— SafeSpace —

DRAIN THE SWAMP!

What has just happened?

 

Shadow Government 0001

Opinion by: R.S. Helms 1-23-2018

Folks, something just happened in our government that we cannot let the Mainstream Media down-play, redefine, or fail to simply report the truth.  It seems that a supposed secrete memo concerning FISA and the intelligence agencies including the FBI, showing just how far out of control our government is out of control, especially the liberal Democratic pundits who have overdosed on the Soros – Obama – Clinton crime family’s money.

Well, with this Memo, and Report the tip of the corruption in our government is just the beginning, the beginning or the tip of the iceberg providing our few honest politicians in congress don’t allow it to be trivialized and make sure the public get an unredacted full blown disclosure.  But it will have to take every Republican, which we will never get because some of the RINO leadership are most likely involved.

Nonetheless, at this point it appears to be a serious misuse of power against the citizens of the nation, and a presidential candidate President Trump.  However, from comments by some in Congress, this certainly involves the Obama Administration, his DOJ, FBI, IRS, NSA, and the collaboration of several other federal agencies, The DNC, not to mention the voter fraud and voter violation that have long been uncovered.

It is my Opinion, that we may never know who all is involve, and how much of the rotten Deep State will be exposed other than those in the intelligence agencies and perhaps the Homeland Security, DOJ, court judges, congress and key players in the DNC who have already been exposed by the Clinton Crime Family.  Clintons and Obama will avoid spending their own money if at all possible, but Soros don’t mind doing the spending, and another reason for the American people to dig in our heels on this and do the demanding, not congress leading us away from the truth as they normally do.

We the people deserve to know what has been going on in Washington, and we need speedy accountability for the gross malfeasance of public office and trust.  I have been contacting congress about the demand to release the documents (unredacted), as cold and hard as they may be, We the People have a right to see and read them, and we need to expect swift action and indictments from Obama right down to the grunt who knew but didn’t question his boss.  Congress needs to allow President Trump to fire any of the deep state that he finds reason to boot.  And the DOJ needs to get his hackles up, put on his big-boy pants and go after the whole of the criminal no matter who is connected.  Anything less would be a dereliction of duty to his office and his oath.  He should be dismissed for the offense and charged with a crime.

Members of congress who continue to oppose the release of the documents to the public, need to face impeachment for conspiring to cover-up illegal actions against the citizens of the nation.  Conspirators, there is no lack of them, in the deep state, congress, holdover appointees, and the infamous media who has abused their first amendment protection, (Way over the line).

An immediate investigation by an outside prosecutor, the investigation should investigate every agency and cabinet department for corruption, (Any corruption), with the right investigation it could link the corruption to cover the whole of the Deep State. It is my opinion that they would have to remove Obama upgrades making it a country club for Muslim Terrorists and put in prison cells to house just the upper echelon of the slime-sucking bottom feeders of the deep state.

The deep state, and the liberal – global socialists since George HW Bush, who helped Bill Clinton with the Clinton Foundation after Clinton left office.  Then we have nearly the whole of the Democratic Congress, and all the RINO republicans.  Once we demand formal prosecution for their corruption and treasonous acts and reset the government we may be able to shrink the size and scope of the bureaucracy.  After all, that is the place that the Democrats and RINOs built and gave power to, then protect them if there were hiccups and impending firings.

No one should be just fired, if a person was complicit in any wrong doing then arrested and charged, if the evidence holds true.  They should be brought to justice and jailed.  No more above the law slaps on the wrist.  They really need to be put in stocks on the lawn of the capital, for two or three days before they are transported to the lock-up.  Part of the sentence would be seizure of all assets, bumped from their retirement, and let them live like the average American for the rest of their lives.

Well I pray for them to be made an example, so others won’t expect to be above the law.  And in the future any Attorney General who don’t goo after corruption should be fired, not resign, fired.  I do believe what has been disclosed thus far, is the infamous “tip of the iceberg” and should be understood as such.

This story is critical and warrants our attention and participation to hold our congress and DOJ accountable to do their job.  We can continue to contact our politicians as frequently as possible and let them know if they don’t want to bring these corrupt bottom feeders to accountability.  Let them know just how much your vote counts.  Time for the grass roots citizen to be involved.

R.S. Helms

(re-writes or continuations will be forth coming).

Liberalism … The death of our Nation

 

 

Opinions and Thoughts
On LIBERALISM

R.S. Helms   1/12/2018

 

Nothing quite like starting a post with a conclusion, but in this instance, it seems more like a grabber headline.
“Conclusion … J. Gresham Machen denied that liberalism was Christianity. Whereas, Christianity was rooted in supernaturalism, Liberalism was rooted in naturalism. Liberalism as a religious system, was ‘the chief modern rival of Christianity,’ which was at the very point opposed to historic Christianity.” “A God without wrath, led men without sin, into a kingdom without judgement through the ministrations of a Christ without a cross.” H. Richard Neibuhr. This is the conclusion from an article (30pg) from A. James Sawyer Ph.D.
Doctor Sawyer is a professor at the Dallas Theological Seminary and the author of the work posted on Bible.Org. I would recommend for the serious enquirer, a visit to bible.org and download and print the article for reading; it is a fine resource within its bibliography.
Of course, my purpose is to teach of the fraud that is liberal Christian theology. And how the liberal political ideologies have come to mingle and work hand in hand in the liberal politics, socialism, and a manufactured global utopia for a make-believe millennial generation of liberal cupcakes. It is my studied opinion, that this generation (1980-1995 I would like to expand that into 2015) is the product of liberal propaganda that saturated our public-school system and reached its fullness in 2005-2016.
However, we can’t lay total blame on the public-school system and teachers. No, we have plenty of great teachers both Christian and non-Christian who do an excellent job, as long as they manage some freedom from the teacher’s unions and liberal administers.
Which brings us to the escalated decay of our moral values. I generally cover the last four presidents when looking at the decaying moral values, prior to Bush 41 the values desensitizing of America, of course we had corruption in some form or fashion since Thomas Jefferson.

Over the time span of our history various political issues have lessened and increased our values, according to our political climate. The United States has had its share of the roller-coaster of progress, the progress of man, however, it is my studied opinion that the depraved nature of man would find every opportunity to inflect sin on good men and women, in the form of the infamous “Seven Deadly Sins,” which by the way, have a biblical basis. Proverbs 6:16 – 19 … and in part, “these six things the Lord hates, yes, seven are an abomination to Him.” They don’t read exactly like the ones we read of today, but I guarantee we can find them there, if not in the Proverbs 6, but in the old and new testaments.
It is my studied opinion, that our moral values have stood in the way of man’s depraved nature, and as man has progressed through the ages the more the modern version of the Seven Deadly Sins, control the elite … rich and famous, politicians, the celebrities of the day.
Control over the people, over all the people. The only way that could possibly happen was to build the government and that would be by the election of the right people, pay them outrageous salaries, perks and the opportunities for those with little or no integrity, but pride and greed to replace all integrity and values, as long as the control over the people groups who hold the vote.
False campaign promises, community organizers spending donor’s money to buy votes, register dead people and illegal aliens; people being bussed in to vote from other districts where they have already voted under another name. The system has been “rigged” for decades. It is not at all surprising that since the end WWII and FDR’s United Nations charter that the liberal Democrats started their agenda of socialism.
Meanwhile, liberal Christianity was starting to make a comeback in parts of Europe and would one-day be running amok in the United States. It was with the help of the changing political climate that liberal Christianity was launched. As the political climate, progressed toward socialism, but it would be extremely difficult to get the majority of the people to simply hand over the Constitution to a socialist regime. Dividing people groups and eliminate the moral values would be sure to divide Christianity, Bible believing fundamental theology Christianity.
If you are wondering why the persecution of the Christian faith has been slow but with a constant escalation by liberal activists and politicians. We had the Abortion thing become legal, not by congress but by the politics of the Supreme Court, just as they did with gay marriage, and opening the way for gay targeting of businesses owned by Christians.
Little by little our liberal Democratic politicians have been doing away with our Constitutional rights and moral values of the nation since FDR. They have been joined since the late 70s with the “moderate” Republicans, as they have been ever expanding the “Deep State” (Shadow Government), which is a misnomer as there is no such thing as a moderate conservative Republican.
This has shown to be true over the past years, and why during the Obama administration we began to notice the liberal Republicans being unmasked through the efforts of the Tea Party, and Tea Party Conservatives. Republicans like John McCain, have admitted that the reforming of the Republican Party into the “New Republican Party” which will be nearly as liberal as the Democrats, even to the extent of Social Globalization. We now call them RINOs and AIMOs who are a big problem in our nation today.
Liberalism is the rot of the world, both in the religious and political fronts. It has wreaked havoc in the United States. Socially we are nearing the apex of destruction of our moral values, of the foundation of the family, political ethics and integrity, national respect and patriotism, and have become violently divided on all fronts of our culture and religion.
Liberalism is at the root of it all, and because of the slumbering masses of our constitutional patriotic and Christian majority we have allowed liberals to brainwash our children into what is now referred to as the Millennial Generation. We did that through social programs, our school system, and a “Turn the other cheek attitude of the Christian church.” Instead of standing firm in our fundamental Christian faith, and ridding the Temple of the money changers, we have allowed them to go unchecked until we have the mess we now have.
Liberalism can only grow in the vacuum left by the planned destruction of our values and the majority of Christians caving to political correctness as sin and crime runs rampant in the streets of our nations. I noticed an article headline in which Obama was making a statement: “The social media is dividing our nation.” It is my studied opinion that it was Barrack Husain Obama who has done more to the division of our citizens than any of the Presidents combined since John Kennedy found the key to unlock the black vote.
Dr. Martin Luther King, became more than the Southern Democrats could handle, and Kennedy happened to be in office, and he, along with brother Bobby, came up with a plan, to embrace Dr. King’s cause against the Southern Democrats’ Jim Crow Laws which were the law of the land as far as some of the Southern States.
The Kennedy’s opened the gates of the “Washington Plantation” totally governed by the Democratic liberals, and the RINO’s. The Swamp, Shadow Government and the Washington Plantation is enough liberalism to kill our nation, and will go on to destroy the Christian Church, unless the American citizens start doing their homework. We need to dig into the ones we will be voting for, make sure they have enough integrity and intestinal fortitude to earn our votes.
They have to go with the intention to put a stop to the liberalism that has infested our nation, at any cost they have to love our sovereign nation enough to stand up to liberal globalism. If liberalism wins, even the Democrats who are all for a make-believe utopia that has been promised, even they won’t like what they get. President Trump, cannot do this alone, even though he keeps on keeping on, win after win, but with each win comes a tidal wave of liberal stupidity pushed by the press, and Hollywood celebrities, who just can’t seem to do any thinking for themselves.
Our war is an uphill battle, but, it is a winnable battle, a battle which God will enable us to win, if our hearts are right. Something has to be done, there is so many issues that it is like a can of worms, monster worms devouring not only our nation, our culture, our Christian church and the souls of man. God can take care of what he has promised. However, Jesus told the disciples when they asked him why they were having such a hard time casting out the demon from the boy: ”Some of these require much prayer.” (my paraphrase).
Could be the miracle of putting this nation back on the right track, will take more effort and prayer, and God just may provide the miracle through you and me.

R.S. Helms.

 

Jerry Brown and the Burning of California…

Jerry Brown Hangs Head In Absolute Shame As Brutal Fact Emerges About Deadly California Fires

Source: NBC  

This is sad and it gives us no pleasure in reporting it but it must be done. Because the Democrat’s policies are dangerous to America and they need to be stopped before they do more damage.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Acting Director Tom Homan just confirmed America’s worst fears and announced that one man arrested in connection with setting a fire in Sonoma County is an illegal alien from Mexico.

Who has been sent home at least twice?

Homan went on and you can almost hear the frustration dripping from his words saying that ICE has issued detainer requests for Jesus Fabian Gonzalez five times in the past year.   5 times?

What is the guy a serial criminal or serial arsonist? Or both?

The last detainer was issued on October 16 and was related to his arrest on suspicion of arson.

Sonoma County and the whole state of California are sanctuary areas and this is what you get. Now it should be noted that authorities have not tied every fire that ravaged the area to this man. There were multiple fires, some caused by natural causes.

But the point is why risk it? When one fire could catch and blaze out of control and cost 40 or so lives and do billions in damage?

Are a couple of votes worth it?

No.

According to Breitbart Homan released a public statement that said,

“Once again, a non-cooperative jurisdiction has left their community vulnerable to dangerous individuals and preventable crimes. ICE lodged a detainer against Jesus Gonzalez with Sonoma County jail officials on October 16, following his arrest on felony charges for maliciously setting fire to a property. This is especially troubling in light of the massive wildfires already devastating the region. Over the past year, ICE has lodged detainers against Mr. Gonzalez after four separate arrests by Sonoma County on various felony and misdemeanor charges. ICE was never notified of Mr. Gonzalez’ various releases. Additionally, Mr. Gonzales has been returned to his home country of Mexico on two separate occasions. The residents of Sonoma County, and the state of California, deserve better than policies that expose them to avoidable dangers. Non-cooperation policies – now enshrined in California state law – ensure only one thing: criminals who would otherwise be deported will be released and left free to reoffend as they please.”

Wow. Good job Moonbeam. Share this everywhere so America can know how dangerous dumb liberal policies can be.

%d bloggers like this: