arlin report thought of the day: presumed to be the case……….ah but!

Out of Control Kangaroo Court

(Bob’s opinion)

Thanks, Arlin for your report, spot on.

Reblogged on Bob’s Opinion 11.6.2019

 

 

via arlin report thought of the day: presumed to be the case……….ah but!

Desperate Democrats & RINOs

 

Reblogged from Canada Free Press on Bob’s Opinion … Thank you Judi For a great story, as always.

R.S. Helms … Bob’s Opinion

 

Desperado Dems will never see that Impeaching a popular, duly elected president is only a devil’s dream

Why Desperate Democrats MUST Impeach Trump

Judi McLeod 00

By Judi McLeod —— Bio and ArchivesOctober 30, 2019

 

 

 

Crime Families 000Desperate Democrats NEED to Impeach President Donald Trump for this reason:  Living the Dream of the official return of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden to the White House.

 

Unofficially, Obama, Clinton and Biden are already there,  where they sincerely believe they are still running the show.

Ever since Election Night 2016, the overriding intent of the delirious Democrats has been to steamroll a president who loves his country into oblivion with one failed lie after another.

The widely televised bittersweet farewell of Barack and Michelle Obama on Inauguration Day, 2017 was a carefully staged ACT.  Even as the Obamas were uttering their fond farewells, their surrogate Linda Sarsour was organizing the Big Women’s March for the following day, making the Obamas’  kisses on the cheeks of the Trumps—Judas-like ones.

Having convinced themselves that they duped the new president with Best Wishes, little did they know that by dint of his presidential leadership, he’d soon be kissing them off.

Though the mainstream and social media were never to report on it, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden—the top two leaders of his 8-year-long administration— never folded their tents to go quietly into the night.

Instead, they went quietly into the Deep State where they’ve been working to bring down America ever since.

Presidents come and presidents go, according to electorate whims.  But Barack Obama’s not just a former president, he’s a multi-millionaire one, a president who left office with an estimated 40 million dollars, a booty he somehow accrued during his 8-year-long tenure.

While Obama was making himself rich, main street Americans were struggling to hang onto their Health Care, among other pressing family matters.

When the main players in the Obama admin were making their carefully crafted goodwill departures,  they were of the kind one that conned the masses into thinking, they were merely moving on wishing the new president well.

Yesterday Man Biden was a national disgrace long before throwing his hat into the 2020 presidential ring

Trouble is that Obama, Clinton and Biden never really departed, but merely hung in.

Obama’s former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton never willingly departed from anything, let alone delusions of grandeur that she “should have been president” just as most election campaign polls predicted.

Clinton forgets that most deplorables know that she dodged her victory supporters on Election Night, sending out Campaign Manager John Podesta in her place. Reserving the right to privacy to shed her tears of defeat, for herself, she knew the network talking heads would fill in with a massive national Boo-Fest.

In a book, likely already written in her head, she blamed Trump collusion with The Russians for her humiliating loss—birthing the ‘Russians-Stole-The—Election’ conspiracy with money she took from Democrat coffers.

Clinton continues to blame everything but the naked truth for her loss.  The truth is that some 63 million Americans voted for her opponent Donald Trump ,knowing that it was he and not Clinton who had America’s best interest at heart.

Joe Biden?

Yesterday Man Biden was a national disgrace long before throwing his hat into the 2020 presidential ring.

Age and corruption seem to have overtaken Biden

Age and corruption seem to have overtaken him.  Biden entered the 2020 race more doddering in state than even Clinton who was falling up and down stairs during the 2016 Election Campaign.

Biden—for all of the hoopla that surrounds him—is just another hopeful in the Bus Load of Democrat Crazies.

Activists pushing an agenda of Socialism on America, none of them is qualified to be president, but Democrat leadership is too busy trying to Impeach Trump to notice where they currently stand.

Lost in the seething hatred of Trump by the Democrats is that the masses are thinking of voting while they are stuck on Impeaching.

In the sicko reality of today’s Democrats, they are trying to force the masses back to Nov. 8, 2016 by forcing Obama, Clinton and Biden on the 2020 electorate.

All of their pipe dreams notwithstanding, it just isn’t going to happen.

Meanwhile, Desperado Dems will never see that Impeaching a popular, duly elected president is only a devil’s dream.

Judi McLeod — Bio and Archives

Copyright © Canada Free Press

Thank You, Dr. Carson.

Ben Carson Rejects Political Correctness as Fatal to the Nation

Posted Tuesday, October 29,

ben-carson-speak-768x512

 

“This whole concept of political correctness … it’s going to destroy our nation.” That was the no-nonsense response of Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson last week to Rep. Jennifer Wexton, D-Va.

Wexton was trying for a “gotcha” moment in a congressional hearing when she asked Carson if he would “apologize” for being quoted for expressing concern over “big, hairy men” trying to gain entry to an Alaska women’s homeless shelter.

I could not have said it better. On the most recent edition of “Washington Watch,” Carson—or Dr. Politically Incorrect, as I’ve called him—joined me to make it clear he will not kowtow to political correctness.

“It’s foolishness because, you know, the First Amendment guarantees people freedom of speech,” he said. “What political correctness does is it makes people afraid to express themselves. So coming in the back door, it actually suppresses the First Amendment. And we need to be very, very wary of anything that takes away our constitutional rights.”

Carson went on to nail the consequences of caving into the left’s tantrums:

“Anything that doesn’t agree with them is a hateful word, and that’s what I mean when I said we need to be more mature than that. That’s what I might expect from a third-grade playground. If we make everything such a sensitive subject and everybody has to sit down and filter everything that they say, and we’re listening carefully to their words instead of what their meaning is, what do we become as a society and as a people?”

We’ve got to nip it in the bud before it gets to the place where everybody just is silent. And they can’t say anything because it’s going to offend somebody.

Carson is speaking up for what is a commonsense policy: Sexually assaulted and abused women seeking shelter should not be forced to sleep next to men who think or act like they are women when they are biological men.

But he is also speaking up for free speech and freedom of religion. The left portrays the Trump administration as lacking compassion for people who need housing, but the opposite is true.

It is the Department of House and Urban Development under Carson’s leadership that has expanded access to people who need housing because the agency is once again allowing faith-based organizations to partner with the government after they were excluded during the Obama years. This inclusion of faith-based organization helps meet the needs in local communities all across America.

The Obama administration required faith-based groups to leave their faith at the door and pushed bizarre policies that put men in women’s homeless shelters. Thankfully, we have a HUD secretary who understands the principle that has guided America for centuries—equal rights for all, special rights for none.

That’s what makes America work, not political correctness.

Reprinted with permission from – The Daily Signal – by Tony Perkins

If You Enjoy Articles Like This – Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter!

 

Just a reminder:  If you’re a senior over 50, you can join a senior’s organization for Conservatives, and it is so much better than the left’s AARP … 

R.S. Helms 

More on Dark Money

First, thanks for visiting Bob’s Opinion.

This article is reposted on Bob’s Opinion from the AMAC newsletter in an effort to share on more than Tweeter and Facebook, I would like to have you share it with your followers as it is another great article on the Issue of Socialist Dark Money influencing our national politics.

Thanks again, R.S. Helms — Bob’s Opinion.

 

Politics

Leftist Dark Money Group Pushes Scheme to Pack Supreme Court with Liberal Justices CRC’s “Dark Money Report” Cited by Breitbart Reporter Aaron Klein

Share
Tweet
Email
supreme court

This article originally appeared on Breitbart on October 13, 2019.

Demand Justice, an organization founded by former members of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and associated with a secretive “social welfare organization” financed by billionaire activist George Soros, is pushing a scheme to pack the Supreme Court with liberal justices by adding new seats to the nation’s highest court.

This comes after Demand Justice has failed in its repeated attempts to bring about the impeachment of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

A Demand Justice petition circulated over the weekend reads:The number of justices is not established in the Constitution — in fact, we’ve changed the number of justices seven times throughout our history.

We need every Democrat to join us. Sign the petition and tell Democrats to support adding seats to the Supreme Court today.

The missive, also promoted in Demand Justice mass emails, claims “Republicans stole a seat when they put Neil Gorsuch on the bench, so Democrats need to be committed to fighting back by adding seats to the Supreme Court.”

The petition continues, “You know what’s at stake: the right to a safe and legal abortion, the right to seek asylum, the right to a workplace free of discrimination for LGBTQ+ people, and so much more.”

The activism drive seeks to galvanize support for the concept of adding seats to the Supreme Court but does not explain the process of actually getting it done.

Immediately after the confirmation of Kavanaugh last year, Breitbart News reported that already some Democrats and progressive activists began shifting tactics, pushing the scheme to “pack” or “balance” the Supreme Court by adding two new seats to be filled by liberal judges.

The Supreme Court expansion plot would be enacted if Democrats retake Congress and the presidency in 2020, according to the plan.

Political scientist David Faris advocated in a book published last year for Democrats to pack the Supreme Court with as many liberal judges as they can. Farris branded the plan the “neutron option for the Supreme Court.”

Vice’s West Coast editor Harry Cheadle summarized Faris’s arguments thusly:

[It] would involve first proposing a constitutional amendment to end lifetime tenure on the court and pushing a proposal to let each president pick two justices per term, a compromise that Faris hopes would “end the court wars.” He suspects Republicans wouldn’t go for that, however, so he’d advise the next Democratic president to just “pack” the court as FDR tried to do in 1937 before Congress rose up against him and prevented it. That would involve passing a bill to expand the size of the court and allowing the president to appoint however many justices would be needed to create a new liberal majority, with the friendly Senate signing off on any appointee. (This would be legal, Faris points out, because there’s nothing in the Constitution stipulating the size of the court, which has in fact fluctuated in the past.)

Writing at NBC.com after Kavanagh’s nomination, political science professor Scott Lemieux opined that “Democrats are now much more likely to mobilize against an even more conservative court.”

He continued:

But how might Democratic leaders respond?

A more likely scenario — especially if a Trumpified Supreme Court not only effectively overrules Roe v. Wade but then keeps striking down legislation passed by the next unified Democratic government — is expanding the size of the Supreme Court. The constitution does not fix the size of any federal appellate court, and the number of justices can be changed with simple majorities of both houses of Congress. Doing so isn’t hypothetical: After the Civil War, congressional Republicans manipulated the size of the court to ensure that it wouldn’t interfere with Reconstruction.

In July 2018, Yale Law School professors Ian Ayres and John Fabian Witt laid out the case in the Washington Post for expanding the Supreme Court, referring to the tactic as “court balancing.”

“Democrats need a Plan B for the Supreme Court. Here’s one option,” their oped was titled.

The duo advocated for Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) to announce a plan aimed at “balancing” the Supreme Court if the Democrats can win a majority in Congress and take the presidency in the 2020 election.

Ayres and Witt note the Constitution does not stipulate the Supreme Court must have nine seats and they reference historical precedent for expanding the nation’s highest court:

The court originally had six seats. It expanded and contracted in the first half of the 19th century, then settled on nine. It has remained there since 1869, partly as a political norm and partly to preserve competitive equilibrium.

At crucial moments in U.S. politics, parties have acted to change the size of the Supreme Court. Often the tactic was a political power play. But sometimes it was undertaken for the good of the country, as during the Civil War, when the Republican Congress in 1863 added a seat to the court in part to protect the success of the war effort against formidable legal challenges.

The Democrats’ court-balancing proposal for 2020 should commit the party to expanding the size of the Supreme Court by appointing two new federal judges who, by statute, would be designated to sit on the court for 18 years; thereafter, the constitutionally required life tenure would be served in lower federal courts.

While pushing their proposal under the banner of “balancing,” the Yale professors do not disguise their goal of packing the court with two new liberal judges:

If Democrats took control of Congress and the presidency in 2020, the new administration would effectively have two Supreme Court slots to fill immediately. The party should commit to nominate one liberal (say, the liberal analog of Justice Neil M. Gorsuch) and to fill the other spot by renominating the liberal-centrist Garland himself.

Ayers and Witt were referring to the nomination of Merrick Garland, who was the pick of Barack Obama, then a lame duck president, to fill the slot left vacant following the death of Justice Antonin Scalia.

Secretive Arabella Advisors 

Demand Justice has played a central role in leading activism against Kavanaugh.

Demand Justice is fiscally sponsored by the Sixteen Thirty Fund, one of four nonprofits run by the secretive, massively funded Arabella Advisors strategy company that pushes the interests of wealthy leftist donors. Arabella specializes in sponsoring countless dark money pop-up organizations designed to look like grassroots activist groups, as exposed in a recent extensive report by conservative watchdog Capital Research Center.

Soros’s Open Society documents that it provided financing to Sixteen Thirty specifically earmarked for Demand Justice activism.

The Capital Research Center’s expose documented that from 2013-2017 alone, Arabella’s four nonprofits spent a combined $1.16 billion with the aim of advancing “the political policies desired by wealthy left-wing interests through hundreds of ‘front’ groups.”

“And those interests pay well: the network’s revenues grew by an incredible 392 percent over that same period,” the report related.

“Together, these groups form an interlocking network of ‘dark money’ pop-up groups and other fiscally sponsored projects, all afloat in a half-billion-dollar ocean of cash,” states the report. “The real puppeteer, though, is Arabella Advisors, which has managed to largely conceal its role in coordinating so much of the professional Left’s infrastructure under a mask of ‘philanthropy.’”

Even before President Donald Trump first announced Kavanaugh as his official nominee, Demand Justice committed to spending about $5 million to oppose any eventual Trump nominee for the Supreme Court. The organization sought to raise $10 million in its first year.

Breitbart News reported that within less than one hour of Trump’s announcement that Kavanaugh was his nominee, Demand Justice had already put up the website stopkavanaugh.com, exclaiming: “We need to demand that the Senate defeat the Brett Kavanaugh nomination.”

The news media has routinely produced articles on Demand Justice protesters, with many pieces failing to inform readers that this is not a grassroots group but an organization spawned by professional organizers and tied to deep leftist funding.

Brian Fallon, the head of Demand Justice, served as press secretary for Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign. The group’s digital team is headed by Gabrielle McCaffrey, who was a digital organizer for Clinton’s campaign.

In an interview with the New York Times, Fallon would not comment on the source of the group’s financing, but the newspaper noted that he was recently a featured speaker at the conference of the Democracy Alliance, a grouping of progressive donors.

Democracy Alliance’s founding donors include billionaires Soros and Tom Steyer. Fallon’s panel at Democracy Alliance was moderated by Sarah Knight of Soros’s Open Society Foundations.

Aaron Klein is Breitbart’s Jerusalem bureau chief and senior investigative reporter. He is a New York Times bestselling author and hosts the popular weekend talk radio program, “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio.” Follow him on Twitter @AaronKleinShow. Follow him on Facebook.

Joshua Klein contributed research to this article.

Reprinted with permission from – Capital Research Center

MOVIN’& SHAKEN The Biden Uncover

Opinion / Politics

Joe Biden’s Son Resigns – Creating Massive Ripples

         Reblogged this on Bob’s Opinion from Amac news letter… a great piece so Enjoy.
         R.S. Helms.
Biden CIA Trump UkraineMark Twain is famous for lots of reasons. One is his timeless quote: “Truth is stranger than fiction.” The bizarre story of Joe Biden and his increasingly ignominious family makes the point. Sad, but true.

Even retelling it, a writer is hard-pressed not to choke on barely digestible facts. Allow me to set them forth, then draw your own conclusions.
In December 2013, sitting Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter, flew together on Air Force Two – to Communist China. By itself this is odd, but not unprecedented.

Ten days later, the younger Biden had a contract with a Chinese firm. That contract was to perform work which, by every appearance, the younger Biden was unqualified. Nevertheless, the deal was worth one billion dollars, later increased to 1.5 billion.

A billion dollars would buy the Los Angeles Lakers, Miami Marlins, or Toronto Maple Leaves. It would buy a country like The Solomon Islands, or five F-35 state-of-the-art fighters, or Queen Elizabeth’s Balmoral Castle. It is not small money.

Hunter Biden’s firm is controlled by Biden and a stepson of John Kerry. Kerry served as Secretary of State after Hillary Clinton. A third partner was nephew of organized crime boss Whitey Bulger, convicted in 2013.

Ukraine facts surrounding Joe and Hunter Biden are well-known. The elder Biden, as Vice President, went to Ukraine and threatened to withhold a billion dollars in aid if they did not fire a prosecutor who had his son’s Ukrainian company – a company on which he was a board member – under investigation. The firing occurred; money was released.

Add the latest. On Sunday, October 13, Hunter Biden resigned a board position with a Chinese company, from which he profited mightily – during his father’s vice presidency. The younger Biden announced he saw a conflict of interest with his father running for president.

In the interests of – fill in the blank – the younger Biden resigned from the profitable Communist Chinese company with considerable fanfare. Candidate Joe Biden announced he heard about it in the press. Take that one to the bank.

Since character is king, research is needed to understand the Biden clan, specifically Hunter Biden. Who is he? First, he was booted in February 2014 from Navy Reserves for cocaine use, according to the Wall Street Journal.

That raised eyebrows, even in the Biden fan club. That occurred three months after young Biden’s billion-dollar deal was inked with the Chinese company, and after that trip with his father to that country.

Within months, the younger Biden got another deal, this one with Burisma Holdings, the Ukrainian company at the center of questions about his father’s curious conduct. Looking after your son is fine; doing it in this way, well, not so much.

What else do we know about the sought-after son of Joe Biden? According to a global news report, an April 2017 divorce was wrenching to his wife and family. Reported facts are arresting. Biden’s wife of 24 years “wept” in court, as offenses were chronicled.

They included spending “hundreds of thousands of dollars of marital funds,” on “drugs, alcohol, prostitutes, strip clubs and gifts for women with whom he had sexual relations,” then becoming lover of his recently deceased brother’s widow. Enough said.

We return to judgement of the elder Biden, what the weekend revelation means for Old Joe the presidential candidate – and for President Trump’s shaky impeachment inquiry. Mark Twain would, by this time, be howling.

Here are the implications of the resignation by young Biden. They are five.

First, this makes plain Joe and Hunter knew their behavior was unethical from the start. Why? If unethical to earn hundreds of thousands of dollars – or a billion – from a foreign company while your father is running for president, then it is surely so when he is vice president.

Second, since Hunter and Joe traveled together to China when Joe was Vice President and ten days later young Hunter’s ship came in, an inference is unavoidable: Joe allowed his son to profit from a view that the older was influenced by the younger. That is, of course, patently unethical.

Third, the son’s resignation confirms the father’s poor judgement. Why? Because helping his son win business in Communist China makes more likely his corrupt intentions in Ukraine, interceding to get a prosecutor fired who was investigating his son.

Fourth, and most significantly, this gives the lie to the Trump impeachment. Admitting a conflict of interest in China, odds spike that Joe Biden was involved in public corruption in Ukraine.

That justifies asking facts supporting a Foreign Corrupt Practices Act violation by a former government official, even a vice president – even a candidate. If a president or AG does not have that authority, presidential candidates become free from investigation for past criminality – by announcing.

Perhaps the biggest impact of young Biden’s resignation is that average Americans – Democrat and Republican – now understand the Biden campaign is in a tailspin. Truth eventually outs. The case for impeaching President Trump now falters.

Mark Twain is famous for lots of reasons. One is quotes like this one: “If you tell the truth, you don’t have to remember anything.” Joe Biden might have read ore Twain.

Communism USA?

FIGHT AGAINST SOCIALISM IN THE USA
FIGHT AGAINST COMMUNISM IN THE USA

prepare to accept

R.S. Helms 7-29-2019 Bob’s Opinion

The fight against Communism is not simply against the leaders of the Socialist Left, the Progressives of the Right, but against the United Nations’ Agenda’s 21 & 2030. Agenda 21 is a non-binding, action plan of the United Nations with regard to sustainable development. It is a product of the Earth Summit (UN Conference on Environment and Development) held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992. In 1995, George HW Bush signed onto the actual Agenda 21, and as conservative Americans started to ask questions about Agenda 21, the socialists immediately tagged anyone who asked questions about Agenda 21 as a “conspiracy theorists” and under the delusion that the Agenda and the UN were not actually good for the Nation, that is after George HW Bush founded and put in place the North American Fair Trade Agreement, and as we have discovered it was a disaster for our trade deficit along with other trade agreements we made with other countries like Japan, China, and the EU.

When people started to read the whole of the official Agenda 21 document printed and put up on their website, we learned there were some things happening in our bureaucracy, (now called the “Deep State or Shadow Government”), people started to connect dots, of course we were all ridiculed as CONSPIRACY THEORISTS, and silenced a big many who were doing research. Research that has continued and not until Clinton did the research reveal just how bad the UN and Agenda’s 21 & 2030 actually are for our sovereign nation.

In January, when Agenda 2030 officially kicks in the UN will have the power to supersede and usurp authority over our Constitution, where it may wish to keep us in compliance to the Agenda and that would mean no border wall, no immigration laws to stop “migrant” humans from wherever to come to the United States and receive education, healthcare, welfare, vote, and we would have no say. No illegal aliens, they would become migrant peoples. One more reason to stop funding to the UN and to remove the UN from our nation.

Will the scenario happen? Perhaps, Perhaps the biggest indication that it will happen is how radical the socialists and progressives are behaving on social media and in front of the TV cameras. It would seem we have a war going on within the Democratic congress, a war for the media, for everyone to see, one squad of socialists against the other, or so it may seem. Seems that way on the surface, however, that is not what is actually taking place in the DNC and the Socialists in the Swamp.

Once the latter days of the socialist globalization of the United States, started with FDRs UN Charter and slowly working its way through time corrupting politics and creating a massive bureaucracy, (Deep-State/Shadow-Government), and was in a large part operating under the radar as there were several that kept the socialist waiving the patriots flag. But then during the cold war, the new generation came along, the ones who were rallying under a flag of liberalism.

These were the ones who protested against war and the military. They began their opposition toward the end of the Korean war but, not like they did during Viet Nam, the demonizing and degradation of our military servicemen and women and the nation were most vile. The flag of liberalism was at full mast and the delusional, the people without any purposeful direction for their lives became voters, and whoever they made their hero would campaign on liberal extreme policies, promises, and ideologies, unfortunately, most conservative voters didn’t like being attacked over their patriotism, values, and policies. The liberal adaption of the Alinsky rules worked very well for them, and still does, but with the creation of “Acorn” Bill Ayres and the socialists owned the ‘community Activists’ and ‘community organizers’ and their relentless ridicule against conservatives, Christians, until most slipped into the shadows and a good number of Christians adopted liberal and liberation theology to avoid ridicule for their Christian values.

As that cancer grew it took in much more than the Christians, it took over patriots, everyday Mainstreet citizens, of every creed, color, and sex, it took over the schools, families, white-collar middle-class and even the ones trapped in the ghettos, with promises of making life better, of bringing down big business, and gender-specific normal citizens. They took the honor and integrity of legal immigrants who suffered in the waiting lines to legally be here and pursue their own American dream for them and their families. I don’t blame people to hide in the shadows, or joining a march for equality with their countrymen, with their religion, with people of color, which we all are people of color, except for a true Albino no color except we all bleed red.

We live in a nation that is a melting pot for the world, people looking for freedom, a job and their own slice of the American dream. We live in a nation founded on Judeo-Christian values, principles, and faith. The United States is a sovereign constitutional Republic with a government-run as a democracy BY the People, FOR the People. A Nation governed by a Constitution not politicians or political parties, not a President, not a Dictator and the only King we have is Jesus Christ – Lord of Lords and King of Kings. Every knee, on earth, and heaven will bow before Him and the choir will sing HOLY, HOLY, HOLY is the King.

The United States is the greatest nation in the history of the world, we are a sovereign nation with our own laws, and we do have an obligation to vet and accept immigrants, and we have laws that manage how many and from where they come so that we stay a sovereign nation. So, now the left once again will call me a racist, bigot and all the rest and any new ones they can invent to be used by their puppet brainwashed zombies who ridicule and bully conservatives, not including the paid mobs who show up at rallies, demonstrations and college campuses to bully conservatives and attempt to intimidate the American citizen patriots and biblical Christians into silence. So far, it has worked out somewhat successful for them in their war against our Nation and our Holy God. Now as I indicated I will spend some time with the Agendas 21 & 2030.

As I mentioned, socialism has had a long growing tenure since the forming of the United Nations, slowly spreading out like a drop of molasses on the head of a pin. Yes, it has taken over many nations of the world and with the western world slowly being swallowed up with socialism lite.

What it boils down to is the one-world governance, all being done in the name of peace, and sustainable development as we drag the most impoverished dictatorships, and poor communist, and yes, we have Africa who got rid of the Apartheid took over governments of the continent but they shut out the whites in Government prematurely before they could replace leadership and upper echelon. The outcome? They slipped into a hole and socialism set in to occupy the void, guess who was waiting? The warlords, the bad fellows of Islam. The Muslim Caliphate has made great gains throughout Africa, with the near takeover of Egypt by the Muslim Brotherhood, It is still struggling because it is a Muslim Nation, but trying to at least be a nation although mostly socialist. Most of the continent of Europe is socialist and has allowed the borderless countries to be overrun by the Caliphate So it is not just the socialist global union of the United Nations, but a Muslim Caliphate.

One might ask how socialism has become a center stage with most politicians of all persuasions have taken on socialism and now they are showing up in congress even in past presidents, but not until Obama did it get out of hand and out in the open as it is now. But we ask? How did people vote them into office? Answer: We allowed it to happen, we allowed socialism in at the local polling booth, and before. It started with a tried and tested communist infiltration method, the method is found in Alice Bailey’s 10-point strategy, although she was a Satanist, Alice and her husband founded Lucis Trust in the early 20s and Alice used the trust to publish her books and established World Good Well at the UN and World Network of Servers. But of course, her 10-point strategy was inspirational to the United Nations. Saul Alinsky certainly was impressed.

Saul Alinsky the “Father of Community Organizing” and eight of his “How to Create a Socialist State.” And Obama’s hero, Saul a communist, had a mind-blowing success and fame in organizing communities during the Great Depression, but in some of his “how-to” lists for radical socialists he is best known for “Rules for Radicals” and the aforementioned “How to Create a Socialist State”. The Un took Bailey’s 10-point Strategy with some of Alinsky’ s ideologies and added some of their own and added some of the covert operations from the Cold War and put them into the mechanics of the Agenda 21 & 2030.

Some of the strategies that have been being used simultaneously in most cases. For example, remove God or anything to do with God from our public education as a starting point which started the removal of God from all public facilities, simultaneously removal or the covert evil destruction of moral values by simple ridicule from various groups, say the more confrontational amoral groups such as the homosexuals, Atheists, beatniks of the “beat generation” of the 50s and early 60s which gave way to the Hippies, rockers, hard rock, and drug culture. All of these subcultures railed against the conservative Christian mocking and ridiculing faith and especially Christianity.

So, establishing nonconformist – free-spirited – socialism (lite) and anti-family trend that captured the hearts of the children and young people of our land. Of course, it affected our colleges and universities in time with what we simply called liberals, while of course the Southern Democrats and the Jim Crow laws of the South, forcing the Democratic administration of John Kennedy and his brother Robert Kennedy to yield to the conservative preacher Dr. Martin Luther King’s civil rights movement in the South, to force integration largely in the Southern public education system and in the housing and equal opportunity across the nation. If you should notice that it has been liberalism of the Democrat Party that claimed the victory over segregation or the Southern Jim Crow laws, when it was Democrats fighting against the conservative Republicans who wanted to put a stop to it all way before Kennedy moved troops to Alabama to force George Wallace to put equality into the school system, the workforce, and in the public square. Even though the biggest racist of the day was Johnston who was the one who took credit for the “Civil Rights Act” by simply putting his name on it and signed it as President. Why? legacy and votes.

Now it seems some of our black Americans are waking up to decades of false promises, lies and the delusion that the Democrats are their salvation and offering social justice, and liberation theology to go along with the strong Christian faith they have, or rather once had.

However, because of liberalism in the Christian church, it started to move ridicule of God and American values to ridicule of the Bible and orthodox Christians, who believe the Bible to be inerrant – infallible – and is God’s revelation (exposure of himself and who He is). and is meant to the teaching of born again (fundamental New Testament), Christians who regardless of lateral teaching from Christian Sunday school teachers, Bible studies, and Seminary Professors, we believe the Holy Spirit is the ultimate interpreter and teacher of Scripture. I refuse to allow myself to be intimidated by a bunch of delusional socialist operatives who write the scripts for the “community Organizers” like the UN hopeful Barrack Obama.

Education and control of our children, destroy the national Christian family structure, free sex, and abortion, make divorce easy and legal, free people from the concept of married for life. Make Homosexuality alternative lifestyle, debase art – make it run mad, use media to promote and change the mindset, create an interfaith movement. Get governments to make these laws and get the church to endorse these changes. Notice how well Baily’s stuff has been implemented into our nation right on cue.

Some of the Alinsky socialists’ activities coincide nicely with what Agenda 21 & 2030 are doing and have been doing since 1992? Look at our nation today, decades of American blindness and denial has been Satan’s weapon against the citizens, slowly intimidating, deceiving and relentless ridicule against God and country pushing conservatives into a “guilt” mindset, so as Alinsky would advise radical socialist “community organizers”, from the infamous ACORN, ACLU, NAACP, CAIR, LGBTQ, BLM, and other similar groups. Notice how all the radical protesters are extremely loud with their mouths gaping open and the jaw, the jaw is open to the point of dislocation as they scream vulgarities, hate speech and anti-American trash-talk.

With the left, the ideology of being louder, more obnoxiously hateful, and don’t stop or allow any response, is being a useful idiot for the purpose of enhancing the state of deep division of our diverse citizens on every front. That is a goal of the socialists and they don’t care how they achieve the goal, even if it means looking like a total hysterical clown. Which is what our elected leaders have been reduced to, especially on the left.
We know how much covert organizational expansion took place from the time of FDR’s UN Charter was signed by the 51 charter member nations just shortly after his death. Now, we have 293 plus observer nations, and a global socialist monster well on the path to becoming a one-world order or one-world government, of global citizens under the authority of international law, two classes of citizens elite, and commons.

First and foremost, you must read, in its entirety, Agenda 21 it is long, and you may prefer to read appropriate sections as you endeavor in the task to understand more of why we are in the mess that we are in. Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030, careful examination of both documents will reveal much, especially as each of the goals are implemented and the various UN organizations and how the scheme of implementation occurs at the local level, the towns occur at the local level, the towns through the planning boards as they sign on to the UN sustainable development and adapt their plans.

With each village, county, state that signs on and with the global socialist representatives we send to Washington to represent us. It has taken some time, but we now stand at only an election or two and we will no longer be the sovereign constitutional United States of America the greatest nation in history and our downfall will be imminent.

Thanks for taking the time, perhaps, you can start your information journey?
R.S. Helms…

Fraudulent Journalism …

Why Many of Today’s News Reporters Believe It Is Their Duty to Lie to You

Posted Monday, May 20, 2019, | By Outside Contributor – Brian Cates – Epoch Times.

Reblogged by R.S. Helms …

 

Media-logos

President Donald Trump rolled out a new immigration plan in a press conference held at the White House Rose Garden on May 16 that focused on addressing the major flaws in America’s current immigration laws and border control system.
During his presentation of his new plan, Trump said the following:
“We must also restore the integrity of our broken asylum system. Our nation has a proud history of affording protection to those fleeing government persecutions. Unfortunately, legitimate asylum seekers are being displaced by those lodging frivolous claims—these are frivolous claims—to gain admission into our country. Asylum abuse also strains our public school systems, our hospitals, and local shelters, using funds that should—and that have to—go to elderly veterans, at risk youth, Americans in poverty, and those in genuine need of protection. We’re using the funds that should be going to them. And that shouldn’t happen.”

Trump finished by saying, “My plan expedites relief for legitimate asylum seekers by screening out the meritless claims. If you have a proper claim, you will quickly be admitted. If you don’t, you will promptly be returned home.”

In an act of brazen dishonesty, here’s how CNN’s Jim Acosta summarized for his audience what the President said in a Tweet:
“Trump in Rose Garden speech paints asylum seekers with broad brush accusing them of misleading immigration authorities at border: ‘These are frivolous claims.’”

That bit of sophistry quickly drew the ire of the Official Trump War Room account on Twitter, which called out Acosta’s dishonest reporting:
“How can you do this and go home at night thinking you’ve turned in an honest day’s work as a journalist?”

Acosta shot back the following:
“Hi @TrumpWarRoom.. in the transcript you provided you note that Trump describes asylum claims as “frivolous” and “meritless.” The transcript also notes Trump uses the term “asylum abuse.” Trump clearly is accusing asylum seekers of misleading immigration authorities as I said.”

Now, most people who saw what Acosta did here will wonder how he thinks he has any integrity whatsoever as a journalist after engaging in this kind of absurd behavior.
I happen to know quite well how people in the “DNC media complex”like Jim Acosta can do this kind of thing every single day and actually think of themselves as being heroic for doing so.

Let’s Go Back To 2008 For A Minute
The Associated Press’s Washington Bureau chief, Ron Fournier, introduced the concept of “accountability journalism” publicly back in 2008, which gives reporters a license to go beyond just reporting the facts of a news story in a neutral and objective manner to instead begin putting their thumbs on the scale and start pressing down—hard—to ensure a desired politicized outcome is clearly seen in the reporting. It gives them a “duty” to shape the story toward political outcomes.
Fournier basically endorsed the idea that journalists need to stop seeing themselves as neutral relaters of facts and begin shaping narratives for the public in order to hold the powerful accountable.

There is a marked difference between where the basic facts of a story go versus where the reporter would like it to go due to his or her own political tastes and views. This is precisely why the American news media for many years championed the ethical guidelines of strict neutrality and objectivity in reporting the news. A journalist who got caught molding a news story to fit his or her own biases while omitting key facts from their reporting that counted against the outcome they wanted was considered to be engaging in journalistic malpractice.
Well, in our modern age, such quaint notions as journalistic objectivity & neutrality have been utterly dispensed with. What was once considered ethical malpractice in journalism is now expected and even encouraged in many newsrooms.
You can read more here about the entire accountability journalism philosophy and how some media outlets immediately embraced it while others quickly questioned it.

This new viewpoint of how “to do” the news quickly spread like wildfire throughout the entire DNC media complex. At last, reporters were actually being encouraged by their editors to give free rein to their own political biases while engaged in “reporting the news.” Far from being desirable, political neutrality in the newsroom came to be viewed as a bad thing.

So in case, anybody is wondering why over the recent past it looks as though news reporters took any semblance of objectivity or political neutrality in their work and gleefully dispensed with it, now you know why. They were told it was their public duty to do this.

We are now 11 years removed from 2008, when many media outlets in the political news industry enthusiastically embraced the new accountability journalism guidelines. What did this result in?

Reporters and editors gave in to their worst impulses. They began to give free rein to their most naked biases. And it began showing up loudly and clearly in their “news coverage.” By the time Mitt Romney ran against Barack Obama in 2012, most U.S. news media outlets had ditched even a pretense of neutrality between the candidates.

Accountability journalism was the last thing the American news industry needed. Fournier’s Frankenstein monster has now created an entire generation of reporters and editors who see absolutely nothing wrong whatsoever with being politically partisan and biased in their “shaping narratives” and calling it “news coverage” as they relentlessly attack one political party while endlessly slobbering adoringly over the other.

‘Heroic’ Journalists Who ‘Sometimes Have To Lie To You’
Since Acosta thinks Trump is a very bad President who needs to be “held accountable” at all times, the accountability journalism philosophy gives him the green light to crudely distort Trump’s words to achieve his goal of being a “heroic” journalist who is holding a power President “accountable.”

So understand this: you can’t shame reporters like Acosta no matter how brazenly dishonest his behavior becomes. It’s impossible because they know exactly what they are doing, and they are doing it deliberately because they see it as their vital public service to set the proper narratives for the public—even if that involves lying to the public.

Acosta and his accountability journalism brethren have draped themselves in the mantle of intrepid public servants, lying, twisting, and distorting the truth in the service of the “noble” cause of stopping Trump. He literally sees himself as a hero as he lies to you. You can’t reach him, so I wouldn’t even bother.
That’s why the old legacy media cannot be rehabilitated. There are too many people inside of it who could never go back to the “old” and “outdated” way of covering the news: strictly neutral and unbiased. They would not even be psychologically capable of doing it.

Instead of being rehabilitated, it’s going to have to be replaced. CNN is on the way out, as are many of these other outlets that went all-in on accountability journalism and ditched all their objectivity and standards in the service of their own biases and agendas.

The DNC media complex’s biases and its political agenda are why they fell so hard for the Trump-Russia collusion hoax for over two years. A neutral and impartial news industry that checked it’s own biases at the door and investigated thoroughly would never have fallen for it.

Far from making the American political news industry better, accountability journalism totally ruined it. It created an atmosphere where being neutral and objective in reporting on political issues is seen as counter-productive and out-dated while all the hip and sophisticated people who are going places and changing the world were the ones who were shaping the news to fit the “right” narratives that people “needed” to hear.

What many in the mainstream news media loved the most about accountability journalism is that it allowed them to openly be what they always were: political activists disguised as reporters, chafing under the repressive strictures of the old model of neutrality and objectivity.

The good news is, the DNC media complex has almost completely rotted itself to the point of total ruin at this point, and the collapse of the industry has already begun.
Trump predicts many of these news outlets will be gone in six years.
I think he’s right.

Reprinted with permission from – The Epoch Times – by Brian Cates